Title page by James D. Doepp. Motto: "That Christ may bring his church into holy and everlasting agreement." (Philip Melanchton)
First volume: 2000. Publication: 2 issues per year (2000-2007), 4 issues per year (from 2008), 400 copies per issue; and on the Internet: https://egyhaztortenetiszemle.hu The Church History Review can be ordered from the editorial office. Publication scope: Church history, history of religion, history of ecclesiastical institutions and persons, history of religiosity, Hungarian and universal history of church-state relations in different periods. The Church History Review does not accept duplicate publications. Publications: studies, bulletins, documents, from the pulpit, calendars, reviews, reports, discussion. Reviews: Publications within the scope of publication are welcome at the address of the editorial office.
Church History Review Journal CrossRef DOI registration number 10.54231 used from issue 2021/4.
In the first half of the 19th century, almost half of the days of the year, about 150 days, were subject to some kind of qualitative and quantitative dietary restriction, i.e. a day of strict fasting or mild abstinence, in accordance with the orders of the Catholic Church. However, by this time, because of the spread of Enlightenment ideas and also for other practical reasons, believers were increasingly neglecting the fasting regulations. The clergy fought this negative trend mostly via the Catholic press of the time, emphasizing the beneficial effects of fasting, but this proved to be insufficient. Therefore, in 1848, a very different solution had already been proposed: during the preparatory work for the planned national synod, many suggested that the number of fasting days should be reduced, hoping that this would ease the burden on the devotees and reduce the number of fasting days broken. However, ultimately this was not discussed in more detail and its possible implementation also did not take place at the time.
The author(s) reserve the copyright of their work.
The Church History Review does not restrict the rights of authors to place their manuscripts or manuscript versions on preprint servers or other hosting. This applies generally to the following formats.
Submitted version
Accepted version (manuscript accepted by the author)